Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Welcome to Technology Chat Corner. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Plus, members will have all ads on the board removed. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The death of IE 6 in 2009? | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 12 2009, 08:08 PM (150 Views) | |
| AGFApan | May 12 2009, 08:08 PM Post #1 |
|
Amateur Poster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Anyone here who has experience with CSS knows that Internet Explorer 6 is the one retarded browser, which does things a little differently than everyone else, and almost always requites special coding to work right. Microsoft has announced it will support IE 6 with security updates as long as Windows XP is supported, which is up to 2014. With the possibility of having this "special" browser around for another five years, many Web designers have made a bold decision. As far as Web design goes, December 31st, 2009 is the last day for IE 6. After that date, new Web sites will not be made with IE 6 in mind. The goal is to force users to upgrade to a modern browser. I don't know if this effort will be successful, but I hope they are. I do know that if I'm not getting paid for it, it is not supporting IE 6. |
![]() |
|
| Dark Knight | May 12 2009, 08:32 PM Post #2 |
|
Admin
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Good riddance to the piece of crap. For the most part I try to get IE6 to behave but sometimes there is just no way to make it happen.
|
| I can't wait for the I'm an iPad/I'm a Maxi-Pad commercials | |
![]() |
|
| AGFApan | May 13 2009, 07:14 AM Post #3 |
|
Amateur Poster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The big problem I have any more is finding a machine that has IE 6. It will not run on Vista without some work and I doubt it will run on Windows 7. I don't know if it is considered a good practice, but any more I redirect IE 6 to the old Website: <!--[if lte IE 6]> <SCRIPT language="JavaScript"> window.location="http://oldwebsite.com/"; </SCRIPT> //--> And if you really want to be mean, there is a lot of code out there that will crash IE 6. |
![]() |
|
| Dark Knight | May 13 2009, 08:33 AM Post #4 |
|
Admin
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I used to just use a different CSS for IE6. I don't know if that's proper or not but you can do it and it works
|
| I can't wait for the I'm an iPad/I'm a Maxi-Pad commercials | |
![]() |
|
| Speedy | May 13 2009, 07:47 PM Post #5 |
|
Google Whore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I already quit coding for IE6, the fact that my site works in IE6 is sheer dumb luck. |
![]() Sometimes I lie awake at night, and I ask, "Where have I gone wrong?"/ Then a voice says to me, "This is going to take more than one night." - Charles M. Schulz Software Reviews | |
![]() |
|
| trewert | May 13 2009, 08:16 PM Post #6 |
|
Wanderer in the Fog
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hey, does that mean I will have to install IE7 or IE8 although I use Firefox? |
![]() |
|
| AGFApan | May 14 2009, 08:06 AM Post #7 |
|
Amateur Poster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No, it is only an IE issue. Oddly enough, even old, Netscape 4 works with most CSS. For some reason Microsoft decided around IE 5 that they were going to reinvent the web with their proprietary code and decided not to follow open standards. With the belief that users would follow them, as they always had. I'm sure there is more to it than this, but I'm only going on memory. I know there was also a lot of hype about the new IE 8 breaking Web pages, and the beta versions had me a little worried. So far it seems that if the page isn't displaying correctly in IE 8 then it also will not validate correctly either. Microsoft seems to have gone in the other direction. If you say it is "XHTML 1.0 Transitional" then it better be. |
![]() |
|
| trewert | May 14 2009, 04:52 PM Post #8 |
|
Wanderer in the Fog
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Transitional would mean that it can be interpreted like HTML 4, too, wouldn't it? I know that I don't need any version of IE to run FF. I wonder if I need to install IE7/8 nevertheless. |
![]() |
|
| Corum | May 14 2009, 07:54 PM Post #9 |
|
Sphincter
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Only if you want to install the IE tabs addon for FF. |
![]() |
|
| AGFApan | May 14 2009, 09:43 PM Post #10 |
|
Amateur Poster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If you are going to write web pages it would be a good idea. However, as I've said before, I'm a Linux user, I know just enough about Windows to be dangerous. ![]() Anyway, it has been a long time since I looked at an HTML 4 book. But that was just an example. The surest way to find out is to try to validate your code. I have found that if there are validation errors, then there likely will be display errors in IE8. Firefox might forgive using <br> but in IE8, with said document type, it better be <br />. I can't say I like using IE8 at all. Unlike Google Chrome it is not a simple nor beautiful interface at all. Like most Microsoft interfaces it is too complex, disorganized and assumes the user is an idiot. However, I can say I do not hate writing for it. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Microsoft · Next Topic » |
| Theme: TCC Default | Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 5:41 AM Mar 12 |
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards





![]](http://209.85.48.16/static/1/pip_r.png)



For the most part I try to get IE6 to behave but sometimes there is just no way to make it happen.

